O
Livonia
← Community
Public SafetyCommunity discussion

Flock surveillance system

Livonia

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (5)

At a glance

Public comments
5
Last 30 days
5

Discussed at 2 meetings in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 12, 2026.

Public comments (6)

OpposedSteve KingOct 12, 2026

Said the $295,000 Flock purchase bypassed voters via a consent agenda and demanded independent civilian oversight and a full public review before more cameras go up.

City Council - Oct 12, 2026 · 12:06 →
OpposedLori (Unidentified last name)Oct 12, 2026

Cited wrongful arrests from bad license plate data elsewhere and urged the council to 'deflock' Livonia.

City Council - Oct 12, 2026 · 15:00 →
OpposedElijah (Unidentified last name)Oct 12, 2026

A computer engineer by background, he warned Flock's Nova product trains AI on police data, that the cameras are hackable, and that data pooling creates a breach target.

City Council - Oct 12, 2026 · 17:33 →
OpposedJosie LeatherOct 12, 2026

A mother of three, she thanked the council for keeping an open mind and urged members to reconsider their stance on mass surveillance.

City Council - Oct 12, 2026 · 24:27 →
OpposedNoah Joseph OczykOct 12, 2026

Compared mass surveillance to authoritarian regimes and quipped 'in Russia, TV watches you.'

City Council - Oct 12, 2026 · 25:30 →
OpposedElijahSep 28, 2026

Urged the council to reject Flock cameras, citing nationwide network access, ICE use of such systems, and FOIA data from Ferndale.

City Council - Sep 28, 2026 · 10:25 →